tags: [] - coffee/green-beans - coffee/quality-control aliases: - Green coffee defect grading - SCA defect classification - Coffee defect counting
Defect Grading¶
Tags: #coffee/green-beans #coffee/quality-control Aliases: Green coffee defect grading, SCA defect classification, Coffee defect counting Related: Quality Control MOC | Green Coffee Grading | Common Defects | Specialty Coffee | Cupping Status: ✅ Complete
Overview¶
Defect grading is the systematic physical inspection and classification of green coffee to count quality defects before roasting. The SCA (Specialty Coffee Association) green coffee grading standard evaluates a 350 g sample, classifying defects into two categories by severity and applying defined equivalence factors to arrive at a total full-defect count. A coffee must achieve zero Category 1 defects and no more than five full Category 2 defect equivalents — in addition to cupping at 80 points or above — to qualify as specialty grade.
The Two-Category System¶
The SCA green grading system divides defects into two severity categories:
Category 1 (primary defects): Each instance counts as one full defect. Even a single Category 1 defect disqualifies a lot from specialty grade. Examples: full black bean, full sour bean, dried cherry/pod, large foreign matter (stone, stick), severe insect damage.
Category 2 (secondary defects): Multiple instances are required to constitute one full defect equivalent. Typically five Category 2 instances of a given type equal one full defect (some exceptions apply). Specialty grade allows a maximum of five full Category 2 defect equivalents in the 350 g sample.
Specialty Grade Requirements¶
| Criterion | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 350 g green coffee |
| Category 1 defects | Zero allowed |
| Category 2 defect equivalents | Maximum 5 full defect equivalents |
| Cup score | 80+ points on SCA cupping scale |
| Both criteria | Must be met simultaneously — defect-free green does not guarantee specialty without the cup score |
Common Defects and Classification¶
| Defect | Category | Equivalence | Cup impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full black bean | 1 | 1 per bean | Phenolic, fermented; severe |
| Full sour bean | 1 | 1 per bean | Vinegar, acetic; severe |
| Dried cherry/pod | 1 | 1 per cherry | Mouldy, fermented; severe |
| Large stone or stick | 1 | 5 per object | Equipment damage risk |
| Partial black bean | 2 | 5 = 1 | Moderate off-flavour |
| Partial sour bean | 2 | 5 = 1 | Ferment note in cup |
| Parchment | 2 | 2–3 = 1 | Papery, haylike |
| Floater | 2 | 5 = 1 | Roasts unevenly; grassy, astringent |
| Immature/unripe bean | 2 | 5 = 1 | Astringent, grassy |
| Shell bean | 2 | 5 = 1 | Hollow, pale roast; dilutes cup |
| Broken/chipped/cut | 2 | 5 = 1 | Uneven extraction |
| Slight insect damage | 2 | 3–5 = 1 | Minor off-flavour |
| Withered bean | 2 | 5 = 1 | Light weight; underdevelopment in roast |
Grade Tiers¶
| Grade | Category 1 | Category 2 defects | Cup score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specialty | 0 | 0–5 full equivalents | 80+ |
| Premium | 0 | 6–8 full equivalents | 75–79.99 |
| Exchange | 0–3 | Up to 23 full equivalents | 60–74.99 |
| Below Standard | Exceeds limits | — | Below 60 |
Regional Grading Variations¶
Different producing countries use grading systems that partially overlap with or diverge from the SCA standard:
Brazil: Heavily emphasises defect counting; grade names (Strictly Soft, Soft, Softish, Hard) reflect cup quality and defect profile in a 300 g sample. Screen size and colour are also classified.
Colombia: Screen size (Supremo / Excelso) is the primary classification; European Preparation (EP) designation indicates hand-sorted, near-defect-free lots. Defect counts are secondary.
Ethiopia: Grade 1 (0–3 defects), Grade 2 (4–12), Grade 3 (13–27), with separate grading tracks for washed and natural lots, in a 300 g sample.
Central America: Altitude-based classifications (Strictly Hard Bean, Hard Bean) are primary; European Preparation (EPW) designates defect-sorted lots; hand-sorting is expected for specialty-positioned coffees.
The Grading Process¶
A standard defect grading session: 1. Spread the 350 g sample on a white or black surface under good light 2. Physically sort and separate defective beans by category 3. Count each defect type separately; calculate full defect equivalents for Category 2 using the appropriate equivalence factor 4. Sum Category 1 count and all Category 2 equivalents for the total defect score 5. Record defect types, counts, category totals, date, and grader identity
Electronic colour sorting machines supplement hand-sorting in large-scale operations by detecting colour and density anomalies at high throughput.
Key Facts¶
- SCA defect grading uses a 350 g sample; two categories (primary/Category 1; secondary/Category 2)
- Specialty grade requires zero Category 1 defects and ≤5 full Category 2 equivalents, plus ≥80 cup score
- Full black, full sour, dried cherry, and large foreign matter are Category 1 — each counts as one full defect; any single occurrence disqualifies specialty grade
- Category 2 defects use equivalence factors (typically 5 = 1 full defect); up to five full equivalents are permitted in specialty grade
- Defect grading and cup score are both required for specialty assessment; a physically clean lot must still cup at 80+ points
Related Notes¶
- Quality Control MOC
- Green Coffee Grading
- Common Defects
- Specialty Coffee
- Cupping
- Defect Categorisation
References¶
- Specialty Coffee Association — Green Coffee Classification System
- World Coffee Research — Green Coffee Defect Reference
- Wintgens, J.N. (Ed.). (2009). Coffee: Growing, Processing, Sustainable Production. Wiley-VCH
Changelog¶
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-02 | Compliance review: full rewrite — removed bold pseudo-header bullet-point glossary format; rebuilt as encyclopedic article with two-category system explanation, defect table, grade tier table, regional variations, grading process; added frontmatter, metadata block, Key Facts, References, Changelog, copyright |
This article is part of All-About-Coffee.com - The comprehensive coffee knowledgebase.
Copyright © Matthew Clairmont 2026